Brain Injury Care Provider

Is a cure for Alzheimer’s on the Government’s checklist?

Is a cure for Alzheimer’s on the Government’s checklist?

By Julia Senah, Clinical Director, Almond Care

As a complex care provider, I’m no stranger to the ‘finding a cure’ approach to progressive and disabling medical conditions such as Alzheimer’s and dementia more widely – of which Alzheimer’s disease causes around 70 per cent of all cases.

Alzheimer’s disease is one of the most challenging conditions facing the UK’s ageing population. 982,000 people are currently living with some form of dementia in the UK, predicted by the Alzheimer’s Society to rise to 1.4 million by 2040.

I work with individuals and loved ones dealing with conditions and injuries which have, for many years, been the subject of curative research, so the question of whether the Government is prioritising one for Alzheimer’s disease is a natural one.

However, I’ve also seen the incredible value of the right complex care for individuals with disabilities or long-term health conditions – which begs the question whether the Government is opting for this route instead.

Is dementia a priority for the Government?

Successive Governments have asserted the dangers of dementia to public health and wellbeing for patients, but what is being done about it?

In the Labour Party’s 2024 Election manifesto, the Government pledged to put “Britain at the forefront of transforming treatment for dementia”.

It is not yet fully clear how it will achieve this – we may see funding announced in the forthcoming Autumn Budget – but this key area of research is likely to figure into the Government’s pledge to “drive innovation” in pharmaceuticals and medicine and support faster approvals for new technologies and medicines.

In the realm of care, the Government had a lot more to say in its manifesto – citing the need to address the challenges facing public healthcare with regard to patient demand, an ageing population and ongoing staff shortages.

It pledged to ensure that “everyone lives an independent, prosperous life” in its social care reform manifesto, efforts which will eventually create the National Care Service for a “home-first” approach to care.

It seems likely, then, that the Government’s priority is transforming care for those with progressive dementia, rather than solely finding a cure.

What can care do?

Whether the Government is aiming for an Alzheimer’s cure or not, it will doubtless be a long process that is occasionally stalled by funding or force majeure.

In short, it doesn’t address the complex and shifting needs of those with dementia in the here and now.

Care, including complex care for more advanced cases of dementia (Alzheimer’s-related or otherwise), is looking like the order of the day for living a full and independent life with dementia.

Care in the home is often viewed through a narrow lens, but it can achieve a significant amount, with support including:

  • Daily tasks such as cooking and cleaning
  • Hygiene and personal care
  • Social support and transport
  • 24-hour or live-in care
  • Night care
  • Complex medical support such as ventilation.

In other words, care is a spectrum. Dementia is an individual condition which progresses at different rates and intensities, with care available and tailored to each stage.

The progressive of the condition is one of the most frightening aspects of the condition, particularly as memory and mobility issues arise more frequently and severely. Individualised care can be there to step in when new challenges arise and ease the transition at every step.

Care that fits into a person’s life and individual needs looks to be the way forward, backed by the Government’s social care-led approach to supporting those with dementia.

While a cure doesn’t seem to be priority number one, it is certainly supported by forthcoming pledges to enhance the availability of cutting-edge treatments and therapies for the wider population.

While we wait, care is there to help individuals and loved ones in the fight with Alzheimer’s disease.  

To find out more information on how we can support those with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, please contact our team.

The Government must prioritise youth social care in the face of alarming trends, says Almond Care Children’s Services

The Government must prioritise youth social care in the face of alarming trends, says Almond Care Children’s Services

Health and wellbeing for children and young people have rarely been off the collective lips of the adolescent care sector in recent weeks, following a General Election and King’s Speech filled with pledges to transform health and social care provisions.

Nuneaton-based children’s care provider, Almond Children’s Services, says that proposals to revolutionise support for the most vulnerable children are welcomed across the sector – but their success will depend on the willingness to act boldly.

Matthew Gorvin, Head of Children’s Services at Almond Care, said: “The communication from our new Government on children’s health and wellbeing is clear: security, fairness and opportunity.

“It seems to me that there will be a particular focus on youth justice and improving all aspects of social care, safeguarding and adoption to residential homes for young people, particularly from Janet Daby MP, the new Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Education.

“The Government’s aim to be a ‘mission-led’ administration is also apparent. I am very keen to see how this will play out once priority policies have been announced.”

Assessing the Government’s proposed policies, the provider particularly praised measures to address what authorities call the “woefully out of date” mental health legislation for children and young people, particularly those in care settings for whom the transition to independence in most challenging.

Matthew continued: “Within the sector, this is an area of shortfall in many ways, and has been noted by operators, staff and clients.

“One concern the care sector currently faces is the mental health of young adults moving out of children’s residential care. The statistics in relation to those people’s mental health, self-harm and even suicidal tendencies are alarming.

“This is not down to individual providers or staff, but rather seemingly down to the lack of infrastructure for young people transitioning into adulthood.

“For this reason, I’m really pleased to hear there is a proposal for a new legal right for children in residential care to see their families. This will further enforce the need for placing children closer to their families – but I think we can go further.

“There is still a significant shortfall of children’s homes in key areas, such as London and the South East. Despite the positive move made by current proposals, I feel there needs to be a greater emphasis on providing resources to local authorities to support local children’s homes.

“Alongside mental health treatment infrastructure, social support and safeguarding for vulnerable people, keeping young people local while accessing the support they need could set us on the path towards better all-round mental health for the most vulnerable.”

Call us today!

For a free, no-obligation discussion about our UK complex care in the home for brain injury, spinal cord injury, long-term ventilation, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy and other neurological conditions, please click here or call 024 7610 2333.